The genius of the wee Doctor behind the electronic voice on trial?

Stephen Hawking's influence has been significant.
He was a remarkable individual who outlived the medical men who said he would die an early death. Ha ha!
Still, the public has a right to examine his Grand Design theory of the universe.
Stephen Hawking On Trial documents some flaws in the final theory of an elder physicist.
In-depth analyses of 64 renowned physicists revealed inconsistencies in Hawking’s thesis:
• Hypotheses promoted as vital to his theory lacked supportive empirical data
• Three major questions he didn't discuss deserved real answers
• What we factually know, but more importantly, what Hawking failed to explain in his theory

Because no human is perfect, all research must stand up to exacting scrutiny.
Evaluating theories is the basis of the scientific method.
Evidence must be beyond reasonable doubt: the rationale that jurors, scientists, and logical people use to settle an issue

Critical roadblocks in today's cosmology

"Theoretical physics is at a crossroads right now…In a sense we’ve entered a very deep crisis.”
Dr. Neil Turok – Director of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

Cosmology doesn’t thrive on uncertainty.
Dr. Hawking's Grand Design idea increased the uncertainty factor.
Impartial investigators legitimately challenged: “Let’s have a look at your evidence.”

"I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned."
Dr. Richard Feynman – eminent physicist acclaimed for his work in quantum electrodynamics and particle physics

Gravity: the most common force in nature

This book challenges physicists who misapply gravitation to promote unproven hypotheses as if they were genuine theories.
It's unjustifiable because unproven hypotheses are simply ideas, hopes, and aspirations.

NASA physicists admit that dark matter and dark energy are unknown factors.
But they comprise 96% of the universe.
That's why most physicists readily admit they only understand 4% of the universe.

Yet Professor Hawking declared on a national TV broadcast:
“The scientific account is complete."
Can our account of the cosmos be complete if we only understand 4% of the universe?
Every physicist agrees that our present knowledge of the laws of physics are far from settled.
Thus, there is legitimate cause for Hawking's grand design theory to stand trial.

Dr. Hawking portrayed his Girand design theory as scientific; meaning it was supported by data.
But his "evidence" was mostly clouds of caveats and probabilities.
Very few of his ideas were supported by real data.

“As a scientist and as an educator, I like the idea that we believe things because there’s evidence.”
Dr. Richard Dawkins – Oxford University Professor & Bestselling Author

"Stephen Hawking On Trial is compelling reading for anyone with an interest in physics and cosmology. It may challenge your beliefs, or maybe not, but it's a fascinating read in either case."
J. Chambers – Amazon Top 10 Reviewer

And now, it's disconcerting to see 1 star posts attacking the author of this book.
Posting ad hominem comments with no supporting evidence is the method of neophytes, not physicists.
Ad hominem attacks reveal an inability to address arguments logically.
Having not read this book, such neophytes remain ignorant of the points renowned physicists have thoroughly discussed in this book.

Judge the controversy for yourself.
Click the Look Inside feature to read the first 10% of this book for Free.
When you're satisfied, download your copy to study the entire discussion.

BONUS: Videos clarifying quantum principles of particle entanglement and the double slit experiment are included in the book.